Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Volkswagen Golf 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 155 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Fiat Stilo engine produces 13 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Despite less power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Stilo engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Doblo | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Stilo is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1305 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Fiat Stilo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`810 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | high | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |