Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Opel Meriva 2003
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 101 HP | |
Torque: | 196 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
Opel Meriva is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 21 HP less power than Opel Meriva, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Opel Meriva. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
The Opel Meriva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
1260 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
Fiat Stilo is larger, but lower. Fiat Stilo is 48 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 7 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1410 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`910 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Opel Meriva has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Opel Meriva, so Opel Meriva quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |