Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 32 HP less power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Stilo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Fiat Stilo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 26 cm longer than the Nissan Almera Tino, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Stilo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |