Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Volvo V40 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo and Volvo V40 have the same engine power, but Fiat Stilo torque is 10 NM less than Volvo V40. Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
| By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Fiat Stilo is larger. Fiat Stilo is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 4 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |