Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Renault Megane 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 255 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
1260 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
960 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.46 m | |
Fiat Stilo is 2 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`890 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Megane has
| |