Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Volvo V50 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 21 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Fiat Stilo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.45 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1307 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |