Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 163 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Stilo engine produces 18 HP more power than Nissan Almera Tino, but torque is 1 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino. Thanks to more power Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Nissan Almera Tino is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Stilo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera Tino gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 26 cm longer than the Nissan Almera Tino, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Stilo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino, which means Fiat Stilo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |