Fiat Stilo 2006 vs Kia Ceed 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 25 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.49 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 2 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 528 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Fiat Stilo has 18 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Fiat Stilo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |