Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Citroen Xsara 2003

 
Fiat Stilo
2003 - 2006
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 103 HP110 HP
Torque: 145 NM147 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds9.9 seconds
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving.
Fiat Stilo engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Citroen Xsara. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.66.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway980 km on highway
760 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Engines

Engine production duration: 12 years15 years
Engine spread: Used also on Fiat DobloInstalled on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.37 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.57 m1.42 m
Fiat Stilo is larger.
Fiat Stilo is 15 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 6 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 15 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`100
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000800
Pros and Cons:
    Citroen Xsara has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv