Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Stilo engine produces 33 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 407, Peugeot 206 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.64 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Fiat Stilo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |