Fiat Stilo 2006 vs Kia Ceed 2007

 
Fiat Stilo
2006 - 2007
Kia Ceed
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 95 HP109 HP
Torque: 128 NM140 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds11.6 seconds
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving.
Fiat Stilo engine produces 14 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 90 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
850 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.25 m
Width: 1.76 m1.79 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Stilo and Kia Ceed are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres340 litres
Fiat Stilo has more luggage capacity.
Fiat Stilo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed.
Turning diameter: 10.5 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`000no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Kia Ceed has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 20002600
Pros and Cons: Fiat Stilo has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Kia Ceed has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv