Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
Fiat Stilo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan Almera Tino has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.8 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 150 HP | 112 - 136 HP | |
Torque: | 128 - 320 NM | 163 - 304 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | 10.5 - 14.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.3 | 6.4 - 9.3 | |
Fiat Stilo petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera Tino. On average, Fiat Stilo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
Fiat Stilo is 26 cm longer than the Nissan Almera Tino, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Stilo is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
Fiat Stilo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Stilo has 70 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino, which means Fiat Stilo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`225 | ~ 1`908 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |