Fiat Stilo 2006 vs Kia Ceed 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiat Stilo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Kia Ceed has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 120 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 280 NM | 137 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 12.4 seconds | 10.3 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 7.0 | 4.7 - 7.7 | |
|
On average, the Fiat Stilo petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Kia Ceed. On average, Fiat Stilo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Stilo is 1 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
Fiat Stilo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Stilo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`133 | ~ 1`778 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |