Fiat Panda 2003 vs Chevrolet Matiz 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 102 NM | 87 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
Fiat Panda is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Panda engine produces 4 HP less power than Chevrolet Matiz, but torque is 15 NM more than Chevrolet Matiz. Despite less power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Matiz, which means that by driving the Fiat Panda over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Panda consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Matiz. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 38 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
530 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.54 m | 3.50 m | |
Width: | 1.58 m | 1.50 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.48 m | |
Fiat Panda is larger. Fiat Panda is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Matiz, 8 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Panda is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Matiz. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 795 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | low | |
Fiat Panda has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Matiz has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Panda, so Fiat Panda quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2600 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Chevrolet Matiz has
| |