Fiat Panda 2003 vs Mazda 2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Fiat Panda is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 2 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 54 - 100 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 88 - 145 NM | 110 - 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 20 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.6 | 4.5 - 7.1 | |
Fiat Panda petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Fiat Panda equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.54 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.58 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
Fiat Panda is smaller, but slightly higher. Fiat Panda is 38 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 267 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1044 litres | |
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Fiat Panda has 61 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda 2, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 818 | ~ 1`512 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | high | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |