Fiat Freemont 2011 vs Ford Kuga 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Fiat Freemont engine produces 34 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Ford Kuga. Despite the higher power, Fiat Freemont reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.4 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Freemont consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Freemont could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Freemont gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Fiat Freemont is larger. Fiat Freemont is 45 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 4 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Freemont is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1461 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Freemont has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |