Fiat Freemont 2011 vs Ford Kuga 2008

 
Fiat Freemont
2011 - 2016
Ford Kuga
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 170 HP136 HP
Torque: 350 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.6 seconds
Fiat Freemont engine produces 34 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Ford Kuga. Despite the higher power, Fiat Freemont reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.45.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Fiat Freemont consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Freemont could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Freemont consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga.
Fuel tank capacity: 78 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1210 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
1470 km on highway1280 km on highway
1040 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption
Fiat Freemont gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.89 m4.44 m
Width: 1.88 m1.84 m
Height: 1.68 m1.68 m
Fiat Freemont is larger.
Fiat Freemont is 45 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 145 litres410 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 145 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1461 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.6 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety:
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 82007200
Pros and Cons: Fiat Freemont has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Kuga has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv