Fiat Freemont 2011 vs Ford Kuga 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Fiat Freemont engine produces 4 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Ford Kuga. Despite the higher power, Fiat Freemont reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Freemont consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Freemont could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Freemont consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
1470 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
1040 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Fiat Freemont gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.89 m | 4.44 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Fiat Freemont is larger. Fiat Freemont is 45 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 145 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1461 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 8200 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Freemont has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |