Fiat Freemont 2011 vs Ford Kuga 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 280 HP | 136 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 342 - 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.3 seconds | 8.2 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 11.3 | 5.3 - 10.3 | |
|
Fiat Freemont petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Fiat Freemont equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Fiat Freemont is larger. Fiat Freemont is 45 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 4 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Freemont is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1461 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Fiat Freemont has 265 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. This could mean that the Fiat Freemont uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`510 | ~ 2`130 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Kuga has
| |