Fiat Croma 1987 vs Ford Sierra 1987
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Fiat Croma engine produces 11 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Ford Sierra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Fiat Croma) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Sierra) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 8 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 7 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |