Fiat Croma 1991 vs Mazda 626 1994

 
Fiat Croma
1991 - 1993
Mazda 626
1994 - 1995
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 118 HP76 HP
Torque: 247 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds14.7 seconds
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive.
Fiat Croma engine produces 42 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.86.8
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Fiat Croma consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.70 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.39 m
Fiat Croma is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data747 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`715
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 800600
Pros and Cons: Fiat Croma has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv