Fiat Croma 1991 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 247 NM | 201 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 26 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Fiat Croma) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 15 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Croma is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |