Fiat Croma 1991 vs Ford Sierra 1990

 
Fiat Croma
1991 - 1993
Ford Sierra
1990 - 1991
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 118 HP146 HP
Torque: 247 NM229 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds9.2 seconds
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving.
Fiat Croma engine produces 28 HP less power than Ford Sierra, but torque is 18 NM more than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.811.6
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Fiat Croma consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle510 km in combined cycle
Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.45 m
Width: 1.76 m1.72 m
Height: 1.44 m1.39 m
Fiat Croma is larger.
Fiat Croma is 7 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`350
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 8001800
Pros and Cons: Fiat Croma has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Ford Sierra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv