Fiat Croma 1991 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 118 HP | 73 HP | |
Torque: | 247 NM | 132 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 45 HP more power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Toyota Carina E. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.8 | |
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
Fiat Croma is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 6 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |