Fiat Croma 1993 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 16 HP more power than Ford Sierra, but torque is 16 NM less than Ford Sierra. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 11.6 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 7 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |