Fiat Croma 1993 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 17 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Ford Sierra. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Fiat Croma) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Sierra) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 10 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 7 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |