Fiat Croma 1993 vs Rover 200 1993

 
Fiat Croma
1993 - 1996
Rover 200
1993 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 137 HP200 HP
Torque: 180 NM237 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds6.5 seconds
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving.
Fiat Croma engine produces 63 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 57 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.27.9
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Fiat Croma consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 195 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.22 m
Width: 1.76 m1.68 m
Height: 1.44 m1.40 m
Fiat Croma is larger.
Fiat Croma is 30 cm longer than the Rover 200, 8 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data352 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Rover 200, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3001`615
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons:
    Rover 200 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv