Fiat Croma 1993 vs Mazda 626 1991

 
Fiat Croma
1993 - 1996
Mazda 626
1991 - 1995
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP117 HP
Torque: 162 NM173 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds12.4 seconds
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving.
Fiat Croma engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.78.5
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Fiat Croma consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.70 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.39 m
Fiat Croma is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data747 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`300no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 800600
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 626 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv