Fiat Croma 1993 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Fiat Croma engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Despite less power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.2 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Fiat Croma) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 15 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Croma is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |