Fiat Croma 1993 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 17 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 7.9 | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 6 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |