Fiat Croma 2005 vs Honda Accord 2003
Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 155 HP | |
Torque: | 203 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 8 HP less power than Honda Accord, but torque is 13 NM more than Honda Accord. Despite less power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.8 | |
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.47 m | |
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 1 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 575 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1657 litres | |
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Fiat Croma has 75 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. This could mean that the Fiat Croma uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Honda Accord has
| |