Fiat Croma 2006 vs Honda Accord 2003
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.3 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 1 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1657 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Fiat Croma has 72 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. This could mean that the Fiat Croma uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Honda Accord has
| |