Fiat Croma 2008 vs Skoda Superb 2010
Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Superb, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Croma consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Croma consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
820 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.51 m | |
Fiat Croma is smaller, but higher. Fiat Croma is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 603 litres | |
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Fiat Croma has 103 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`154 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |