Fiat Croma 1991 vs Rover 200 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 162 HP | 75 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 - 247 NM | 117 - 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.5 seconds | 6.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 10.0 | 5.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 200. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 30 cm longer than the Rover 200, 8 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Rover 200, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`320 | ~ 1`569 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 200 has
| |