Fiat Croma 1991 vs Ford Sierra 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Fiat Croma is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford Sierra can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 162 HP | 71 - 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 - 247 NM | 119 - 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.5 seconds | 9.2 - 16.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 10.0 | 6.4 - 11.6 | |
|
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Sierra. On average, a Fiat Croma with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Sierra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger, but slightly lower. Fiat Croma is 10 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`320 | ~ 1`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Sierra has
| |