Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Bravo engine produces 38 HP less power than Kia Ceed, but torque is 30 NM more than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 3.7 | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Bravo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Bravo could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 1430 km in combined cycle | |
| 1560 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo is 3 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1318 litres | |
| Fiat Bravo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |