Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Bravo engine produces 19 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Bravo could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Bravo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is larger. Fiat Bravo is 10 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Bravo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 60 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Fiat Bravo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Bravo, so Fiat Bravo quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |