Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 206 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 41 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 69 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.1 | |
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Bravo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Bravo could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
Fiat Bravo is larger. Fiat Bravo is 10 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Bravo is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 340 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 60 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`710 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | Fiat Bravo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Bravo, so Fiat Bravo quality is probably better | ||
Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |