Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 11 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 69 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Bravo could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Bravo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Alfa Romeo Giulietta, Alfa Romeo MiTo | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Hyundai i20 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Fiat Bravo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is larger. Fiat Bravo is 10 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Bravo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 60 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Fiat Bravo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Bravo, so Fiat Bravo quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |