Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Ford Focus 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 165 HP | 80 - 305 HP | |
Torque: | 128 - 360 NM | 124 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | 5.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.6 | 4.5 - 9.4 | |
Fiat Bravo petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Fiat Bravo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.35 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
Fiat Bravo is smaller, but slightly higher. Fiat Bravo is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 4000 litres | 396 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1247 litres | |
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Bravo has 3604 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The Ford Focus may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 1.8 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`801 | ~ 1`805 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Ford Focus has
| |