Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 165 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 360 NM | 137 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | 10.3 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.6 | 4.7 - 7.7 | |
|
Fiat Bravo petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. On average, Fiat Bravo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is larger. Fiat Bravo is 10 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Bravo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 4000 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 3660 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`801 | ~ 1`778 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |