Fiat Brava 1998 vs Citroen Xsara 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
|
Fiat Brava is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Brava engine produces 37 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Thanks to more power Fiat Brava reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.4 | |
|
The Fiat Brava is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Brava consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Fiat Brava over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Brava gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Fiat Brava is larger. Fiat Brava is 2 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 4 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Brava is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
775 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Brava has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Brava has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |