Fiat 500 2012 vs Mazda 2 2015

 
Fiat 500
2012 -
Mazda 2
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 95 HP90 HP
Torque: 127 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds12 seconds
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving.
Fiat 500 engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 21 NM less than Mazda 2. Despite the higher power, Fiat 500 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.24.8
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Fiat 500 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat 500 could require 210 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1040 km on highway
Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.15 m4.06 m
Width: 1.78 m1.70 m
Height: 1.66 m1.50 m
Fiat 500 is larger.
Fiat 500 is 9 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 9 cm wider, while the height of Fiat 500 is 16 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 343 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data950 litres
Fiat 500 has more luggage capacity.
Fiat 500 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat 500 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Fiat 500 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`535
Safety:
Mazda 2 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 2 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
below average

above average
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Fiat 500 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 8009600
Pros and Cons: Fiat 500 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Mazda 2 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv