Dodge Journey 2008 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 241 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Journey engine produces 101 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 240 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Dodge Journey reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Journey is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Journey consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Dodge Journey over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Journey consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Dodge Journey is 7 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Journey is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 127 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 127 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 816 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2117 litres | 1554 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Dodge Journey has more luggage space (by 36 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Journey (by 563 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Journey is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`480 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |