Dodge Intrepid 2002 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Dodge Intrepid engine produces 4 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Dodge Intrepid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.7 | |
| Dodge Intrepid consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Dodge Intrepid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Dodge Intrepid is 18 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Dodge Intrepid has 10 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. This could mean that the Dodge Intrepid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Intrepid has
|
| |