Dacia Logan 2016 vs Dacia Logan 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan 2016 engine produces 15 HP less power than Dacia Logan 2012, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Dacia Logan 2012. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan 2016 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2012, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan 2016 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Logan 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Logan 2012 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Logan 2012 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dacia Logan 2016 and Dacia Logan 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1257 litres | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |