Dacia Logan 2016 vs Citroen C-Elysee 2016
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 97 NM | 117 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Citroen C-Elysee is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen C-Elysee, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Citroen C-Elysee. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
The Dacia Logan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Elysee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Logan consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Elysee. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
1130 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
780 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 370'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dacia Logan engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C-Elysee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
Dacia Logan is smaller, but higher. Dacia Logan is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Elysee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 506 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1257 litres | no data | |
Dacia Logan has 4 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C-Elysee. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 980 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Citroen C-Elysee has
| |