Dacia Logan 2012 vs BMW 3 series 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 94 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 160 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 4.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
1350 km on highway | 1460 km on highway | ||
1060 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Logan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Logan version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 17 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.43 m | |
Dacia Logan is smaller, but higher. Dacia Logan is 28 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Logan has 30 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The BMW 3 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Dacia Logan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4800 | 12 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |