Dacia Logan 2012 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
| Dacia Logan is 35 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Dacia Logan is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Dacia Logan has 180 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Logan (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Dacia Logan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`611 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 185 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |