Dacia Logan 2008 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Clio, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Renault Kangoo | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is larger. Dacia Logan is 48 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 10 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Logan is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Dacia Logan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Dacia Logan, so Dacia Logan quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Renault Clio has
| |